Search results

I don't see any link between your previous posts and the one you just did. No wonder I "didn't get the point". :roll: Now it does seem to be a pretty good one.

You do not listen to what he says do you ? He says that one guy is asked to change his name by a GM. He does it. The new name is approved. => Alright ? No. Later another GM come in, asks to change that approved name. He does. The new name is approved again. .. Another GM comes.. :brow:

I wonder if the new patcher was a stealth noob filter :D

Male halflings are ubber :D .

I know, that's why I have like 4 characters and have tried to play in or at least visit every zone under lvl 30. But Marcel being my main (with the cleric), I'd like to be able to do the adept with him.. I don't get what's so "bad" in the idea :(

Sweet. Seriously. :brow: edit: To answer the post before this one.. Well make it un-recuperable. Like no corpse involved, just a loss of xp.

I found this to be a great way to get some "unique" items. I also go into dungeons but there will be like billions of those on the market very soon. Also I like the adepts just because of the raid style. I played EQ for years and those adepts are something new that really make me stick to WR...

Spectres in South Badlands also drop Dark Essence. Could be it I guess. I'll confirm if I bother to find Corrupted Blood.

Umm perhaps make it like a giant debt like thing ? So you could lose a max of 2 levels or so that you would have to repay before being in normal status again. And you can't lose more xp than that set limit. That would reduce the possible exploits I guess..

This is most probably from the new newbie quests that every town has now. If its like the other towns, then a Guardian of Thaldor has been renamed to "Guardian xxx" and now gives three newbie quests that are gathering stuff from newbie mobs. Take a look around ;). I'll edit if I find it.

Okay, what gave me this idea is this situation: I 2-box a SK and a Cleric. Been doing the Haunted Treant (max lvl 32) for a while, until I got about everything I wanted from it. So I happened to get lvl 33 with the SK. Then the new adepts were added, including Sandjaw, max lvl 32. Did him with...

Did http://wintersroar.com/wiki/wiki.pl?Quests/NewportShieldmaker First created it without the Quests/ in the name so created a second time. Too bad you can't delete wrong entries..

The higher the number, the higher the boost, simply. I think it goes from I to V. Also it doesn't stack in any way. Only the higher one applies (So if you have 2x Affliction II items it counts as Affliction II x1, same if you have Affliction I and Affliction II).

Improved that page along with the erudin Shark one.

Added http://wintersroar.com/wiki/wiki.pl?Quests/NProgue5 http://wintersroar.com/wiki/wiki.pl?Quests/NProgue6 (incomplete atm) Nergul

I think "Halas" isn't enough for the title, something like NProgue1 (NewPort Rogue Quest n1 ..) gives more info.. The page template is quite good tho :P Added a min lvl indicator to the rogue quests :)

mkay so how is a geographical location as a surname not a title ? I think the problem is maybe just my bad english. Could'nt we chill down a bit ? :eek:

Well, yes. That's what I meant. You don't have to be that aggressive. Also Jack The'Great is probably one of the last names I would take. Did I ever said I wanted that name ? Bah. @Melwin: Well I thought those rules were about first names, not surnames, that's all. Thanks for clearing...

LoL I know that name is stupid, but I just took the same example to illustrate. Btw surnames in the medieval times are all titles, that's where the surnames came from (for exemple to differenciate two guys named "Jack" since surnames didn't exist at that time), so I think I'm not the dumb one...

Well, no titles could just as much mean "no titles in first name". While "no titles in first name" make perfect sense, "no titles" in surname makes no sense at all.. So the correct guess is that Jack The'Great is all ok ?